by Tom Julius

Love this photo from the Kennedy High School – School of Sustainability blog.

The blog describes the scene as Kennedy Conservation Corps (KCC) students, under the guidance of Director Matt Hall, volunteered to undertake a large scale restoration project in the upper Brice Creek Wilderness area.  In partnership with the Forest Service, the KCC cleared stream banks of flood debris to encourage fish passage, built bridges for hikers, and strove to  improve  overall aquatic habitat and water quality conditions.”

Kennedy High School – School of Sustainability was profiled in Education Week’s recent article Project-Based Learning Helps At-Risk Students. Kennedy is an “alternative school” in Cottage Grove, Oregon that emphasizes opportunities for “kids who need more real-world, relevant kinds of opportunities.” The school engages students in hands-on problem-based learning through beekeeping, growing organic produce and projects like wilderness restoration.

There is lots to like here: focus on skill building rather than credit recovery and remediation, a cohort mentality that fosters collaboration, and a connection to how the systems of people and place work together. The school director, Tom Horn, talks about how their approach stands Bloom’s Taxonomy on its head. They put students into situations that demand skills at the top level: evaluation, synthesis, application and drill down to the knowledge they need to get the job done.

Do you know of other programs like this? Schools that provide these kinds of learning environments for all kids? Let us know, spread the word!


by Jessica Skinner

Did you know that the number of registered farmer’s markets in the US has grown 128% since 2002 to over 7125 markets?  And that Farm to School programs are active in all 50 states?

There is a strong push to bring more local products onto our plates and into our schools, and to keep those products in communities where they are produced.  So why the push for local food?

Simply put, local food is more sustainable for our community in the long run.  A more localized food system embraces the main tenants of creating a more sustainable food system, taking into consideration the Three E’s: environment, economy, and social equity.

By investing more time, energy and money into our local community through the food system, we support much more than just the farmers and the preservation of our food.  From sustainable agriculture to sustainable land use planning to sustaining ourselves as human beings, the principles of sustainability are the guidelines by which the local food movement is rooted.

Reconnecting with our food and the system that it embodies is more of a (re)localization of our food system, keeping our dollars close to home by purchasing food within a 150 to 200 mile radius of one’s home. I say (re)localization because local and sustainable food systems are not a new concept, we’ve just grown away from them since the onset of the industrial revolution and our ability to grow, move and dispose of things far away and quickly without much thought as to what happens next.

I’m also referring to the increase in the number of home and community gardens springing up across the nation as a way to decrease food miles, our food’s overall carbon footprint, and the larger cost of food.

When national campaigns such as Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food, reconnect consumers to the origin of what they eat, it is evident there is a paradigm shift about how we interact with our food and the system that creates it.

So what is a food system through the lens of sustainability? Virginia Nickerson lays out the basic elements in this diagram from her report “Understanding Vermont’s Local Food System:”

From food production to distribution, waste and nutrient management to consumption, there is a common link that connects each one of them – the change agents that shape and mould this system. There are varying degrees to which each sector of the system plays a role. As in any ecosystem, no one element of the food system can function properly without the other.  When the change agents (that’s you, me, our policy makers, educators and researchers, and others) make socially responsible, economically viable and environmentally sound decisions regarding how our food is grown, how it is processed, and how it makes its way to our mouths, we are voting for a food system that will support us in the future, that will provide livable wages, and will help us to circulate money and other vital nutrients within our own communities.

Across the nation, educational leaders, farmers and parents are creating ways to reconnect people of all ages to various aspects of this system.  The Farm to School Network, whose goal is to “establish relationships between local foods and school children”, and projects such as Vermont Feed strive to get students involved and invested in their food system and their future.

If a child grows a carrot, or visits a farm where they harvest greens for their salad bar, or takes a trip to a landfill where they can see some of the effects of wasting resources, they will be much more inclined to make decisions that are more sustainable for themselves as well as their surrounding environment, including their schools, their families and their neighbors.  The Three C’s, Cafeteria, Classroom, and Community, guide the Vermont FEED network and are the core of many school based food education programs.  By teaching students how to make healthy food choices and by having them interact with their food system, they will become better decision makers in the future.

(Re)localizing and making our food system more sustainable is happening in big ways, from the growth in programs such as Farm to School and Farm to Institution, but also in the development of larger scale food waste composting programs, networks of small food processors and distributors, and educational materials, webinars, videos and workshops about how to sustain our food system so that it can sustain us.  This movement is grassroots AND being shaped by federal, state and local policy.  People are tuning into ways to change their eating and buying habits to keep our money and our resources local, as evidenced by the number of farmers markets, farm stands, gardens, energy reduction programs, buy local campaigns and more.

How can you connect the Three E’s with the Three C’s in your local food system?  

Eat More Kale photo:  Courtesy of Seacoast Eat Local

Diagram from “Understanding Vermont’s Local Food System” by Virginia Nickerson, Prepared for The Vermont Sustainable Agriculture Council, 2008

by Ron LaBrusciano

This is an amazing story.  It speaks to the value of resourcefulness that is missing in the American education of children.  You may have heard the story of Caine Monroy’s Arcade on National Public Radio or been one of more than a million people who have watched Nirvan Mullick’s short film on YouTube. Here it is:

Somehow this child has either escaped technology and video games or leads a life that balances  play and learning of other kinds.  No fancy technology, no expensive arts materials, no programmed learning or instruction evident here – just an inquisitive child, an understanding adult, permission to play and create, and lots of boxes and throwaways.

Caine Monroy teaches us that we must sustain creativity and the joy of learning for its own sake. When we lose the opportunity to play with ideas and freely create we lose the essence of what makes us human. As Educators For Sustainability we must face the fact that curiosity and wonder can not be designed but must be fostered and allowed the space to flourish.

by  Lara Gleason

Shifting a culture requires a tremendous amount of patience, persistence, and collaboration. Prior to four years ago, I only witnessed or knew of such shifts; never was I a generator or trigger. In retrospect, it all seemed so natural: gathering the right people together, pursuing manageable projects, being vision-oriented and action-driven, educating myself and others, and ultimately, maintaining a positive attitude.

The truth is, there were many days when my exhaustion or frustration clouded the successes. Those days were countered by times when I was tremendously invigorated by projects and progress. What remains a certainty is that I am now a believer that it is indeed possible to shift a culture.

Seven years into my teaching career, I decided to tackle a master’s degree. While being an English teacher (primarily in a middle school) was rewarding, it was not enough. I had contemplated graduate school many times throughout the years, but I could not find a program that inspired me. That was until I learned about Antioch’s MEd program, Educating for Sustainability (EFS). The title alone revitalized me.

Before I started my master’s program, “sustainability” was not only a nebulous term but also one that meant little to my Graland School community members, science teachers and environmentalists aside. It was not for lack of caring, but more that such thinking – systems thinking – was not part of their paradigm.

Why would it be? The American educational system is not designed to teach about the interconnectedness of systems. Rather, for generations we have been taught to compartmentalize. Like many teachers, I too, had a somewhat superficial knowledge of systems. Over the two years of the EFS program, my understanding deepened, and I relished the opportunities to share my changing perceptions with others – colleagues, friends, students, and strangers. As a result, a slight shift began.

It was barely noticeable at first, but people began approaching me about ideas and sharing problems they saw on campus. The hitch was that they just wanted me to “deal with it.” I quickly realized that collaboration was the only way to engender true change. Together with the Director of Facilities, my greatest ally, we established a Sustainability Committee with representatives from all stakeholders in the Graland School community (i.e. Board members, students, parents, teachers, alum, etc.). I am convinced that it was this remarkable collection of passionate, selfless, and multi-talented individuals who spurred the change. One of our first recommendations was that the position of Sustainability Coordinator be created. With the support of the Administration, I enthusiastically assumed that role and our work as a committee continued. As a result of this group and the School’s support, the momentum accelerated, and the community commitment increased each year.

A year after I finished my degree, there were initiatives, inspired by various groups, happening all over campus and even reaching into the local community. We evolved from a school that occasionally recycled to one that, among other accomplishments, built the LEED Gold certified dinning hall, had a composting program, and included sustainability in the curriculum K-8!

Anschutz Commons LEED Gold Certified Dining Hall

After being open for only a few weeks, I ate my last meal in the new Anschutz Commons Dining Hall. It was a bittersweet moment. The school had finally made a highly public statement and commitment to more “Green” practices. I, however, was leaving for a new job. At our end of the year celebration, the Head of School shared that the dining hall should have had my name on it. I laughed and gently redirected the compliment. Like all buildings, the final product represented the work of many. It was not, by any means, my building. It truly was our collective building.

While I believe that one person can make a difference, I believe more in the power that individuals have to bring people together to make enduring change happen. In the case of Graland, while there was still much work to be done, the cultural shift that occurred during that time will ensure that “sustainability” continues.

It was not easy leaving my professional home of nine years. Graland was indeed a remarkable place to work. For my personal sustainability, and in an effort to decrease my footprint, however, it was important to move. Finding the ideal job was more difficult than I anticipated. Spring 2011 was not a favorable time to enter the job market.

One school, it turned out, was the right match. Coming from the more urban setting of Denver, the quaintness of Southborough, Massachusetts was a bit of a culture shock, but when I walked onto campus, I knew Fay School would become my new home. To my extreme delight, I learned that two dorms and the Primary School building were all LEED Certified. But it was the people who struck me most. Students and adults were genuinely welcoming and interested in who I was. Now, seven months later, I can assuredly say that this is a special community.

Clearly Fay School has an investment in sustainable practices, and like Graland, it has room to grow. Being new to Fay School, I am back to the proverbial drawing board, assessing the best way to do the work about which I am most passionate: collaborating with people to envision a just, healthy, and safe future and then taking steps to turn the vision into reality. As I did four years ago, I rely less on a title (e.g. Sustainability Coordinator) and more on modeling behaviors, seeking opportunities to develop partnerships, and engaging in conversations about increased understanding of the interconnectedness of our many systems.

In my English classroom, conversations about social justice are common. As a dorm parent, I remind my boys of the proper uses of the recycling bins and draw their attention to ways in which they can reduce their waste. Our boarding community represents a wonderfully diverse population, so I seek opportunities to talk with the boys about issues of equity and socio-economic status. On campus, I model reducing my footprint through using reusable products, turning off lights, taking recyclable items out of trash cans, and composting our household food waste. I reach out to colleagues, such as Fay School’s Sustainability Coordinator, and seek ways to support and partner. These are all small steps, but they are a starting place.

I will focus on building partnerships, maintaining a steady but gradual approach, seeking natural points to weave sustainability into all aspects of my work, looking for win-win solutions to campus problems, and sensing when we, all of us in the school community, will be most receptive to change. Above all, I will remember that there will always be more work to do, to celebrate small successes, and to persevere.

Schools, by nature, shape the future. By being an Educator for Sustainability, I ensure opportunities for positive change. I will always aspire to foster a culture that values environmentally sound, economically viable, and socially equitable practices. As I look towards next year, I am energized and excited to work with my new community.

 

What would happen if the young child went forth some part of every day, forth into the nearby natural world, into the woods and meadows, along paths and streams, in rain or shine, tromping though mudand snow. Would it make a difference in her learning, her health, her happiness? YES! say

"Leaving your children in the woods – on purpose" article from The Local Germany's News in English

teachers ofnature pre-schools and forest kindergartens. After flourishing in Scandinavia, the United Kingdom, throughout Europe and even cropping up in Asia, nature pre-schools and forest kindergartens are taking root throughout New England. Come hear what’s happening out there.

All early childhood and early elementary parents, teachers, outdoor educators and administrators with an interest in connecting children to the natural world on a regular basis are invited.

Wednesday, May 16, 2012
9:00am – 4:00 pm
Antioch University New England, 40 Avon Street, Keene, NH

Cosponsored by: Harris Center for Conservation Education & Sophia’s Hearth Family Center

For more information and to register online, visit our website at:
www.antiochne.edu/acsr/events or call 603.283.2301

Workshop Schedule:

9:00  Opening: Why 21st Century Children Need Nature – David Sobel

10:15  Field Trips and Workshops:
Wonder of the Woods – Amy Friedland
Young Children Outdoors – Susan Weber
Movement and Dance – Jane Miller

Noon  Lunch: Finding/Making Special Places

1:00  Thinking about Outdoor Spaces: Lens on Outdoor Learning – Virginia Sullivan

2:00  Field Trips and Workshops:
A Day in the Life of Juniper Hill – Anne Stires
Babes in Backpacks, Tots in Tow – Susie Spikol
Nature Crafts for Young Children – Ron Labrusciano

3:45  Closing Ritual

$75 per person; $50 for four or more; $50 for AUNE alumni; $20 for current AUNE Students
Registration cost includes lunch

by Paul Bocko

Consider the following: Children at play are building a foundation for systems thinking.  I have been pondering this notion recently while collaborating with two of my students conducting action research.  One is studying the impact of play in two ecosystems in New York City’s Central Park.  The other is investigating how play informs the design of play areas – especially his own school’s playground in St. Louis.

Photo by Rosen Georgiev

So what?  (You may ask.)  I believe that when children engage in un-orchestrated play, they are forced to navigate complexity – the intricate “landscape” of parts, people, and relationships in their immediate environment.  Who has my back on this?  Richard Louv for one.  He believes nature play develops skills in problem-solving and critical thinking.  Louv’s “nature deficit disorder” is a compliment to Diane Levin’s “problem solving deficit disorder” – the condition in which children are no longer active agents of their involvement with the world.  One review of David Sobel’s book, Childhood and Nature, notes that experiences in nature “are more important than learning facts about nature and are actually prerequisites for environmental concern”.   I have found more recent posts that directly link play and systems thinking.  Check out this interview with a professor who is conducting a MacArthur Foundation funded study on the development of systems thinking for middle school students.  Some of this work flies in the face of Louv’s work as it involves students using “new media” to create systems.  Adults too are using play to learn – I found a proposal for an upcoming software development conference workshop entitled Systems Thinking Through Play.  I am confident this only scratches the surface of the resources that explore the linkages between play and systems thinking.

Bottom line: Systems thinking is inherent in the 3E’s – environment, economy, and equity.  How can it not be when you consider the intricacies embedded in each area?  In order to solve pressing problems, children and adults need to develop and maintain problem-solving skills, use all available tools, and mix in just the right amount of play to find the best solutions.  Just maybe we can experience a bit of joy in the process.

Here’s to play at any age!  AND here’s to my students for taking a risk and digging in deep on this topic – I expect to be sharing hyperlinks to their conclusions very soon.

by Rachel Brett

What does Harry Potter have to do with EFS? A lot, especially if you’re trying to teach kids about sustainability. As any Harry Potter fan knows, one of the most important lessons that Harry learns during his quest to fight evil is that he can’t do it alone. Although Harry may be the star of the books, he needs the help of his two best friends, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, to ultimately triumph. Focusing only on Harry means that you’re looking at just one piece of a much bigger puzzle.

So what lessons can we take from Harry Potter? Well, when many people hear the word “sustainability,” their mind goes immediately to the environment. For many, sustainability means being “eco-friendly.”  The environment may well be the Harry Potter of sustainability, but it’s not enough. Instead, EFS must integrate the 3 E’s into how we define and understand sustainability. The 3 E’s are environment, economy and equity, and all three are essential and interconnected elements of EFS. J.K. Rowling builds this theme of interconnectedness into her books both explicitly and implicitly and makes it clear how vital it is for the heroes’ success. For example, Dumbledore repeatedly emphasizes to Harry and others how interdependent life is: what seems inconsequential or unrelated often has vast implications when the big picture is revealed. This concept is woven into the very fabric of the novels, as well. As the story unfolds, it becomes clear that each small and seemingly insignificant action and event has consequences and reverberations on a much grander scale.

When we teach about sustainability, we need to teach people to look at it from multiple perspectives. Environmental health, social justice, and economic stability shouldn’t be at odds with one another—they are all critical components of the big picture of sustainability. If the problems we face are interdependent, then the solutions must also be integrated. As environmental justice advocates like Van Jones and Majora Carter emphasize, even the greenest idea in the world won’t solve our problems if it’s so expensive only the wealthy can access it. After all, it was the boy from under the stairwell, a muggle-born girl, and the son of a mid-level bureaucrat who together brought peace and justice to the wizarding world, not the elite, affluent Malfoy family. In addition, by embracing a vision that was diverse yet cohesive—not fragmented or divisive—Harry found unexpected allies in house elves and Centaurs. Adopting a similar scope through the 3 E’s, then, will not just ensure that our solutions are more holistic—it will also help unite people in constructing a society that is sustainable and equitable for all.

The students I work with understand this. I’ve heard fifth graders wax poetic about how a new technology isn’t sustainable unless it’s fair to all; how our ability to make change often depends on money but our ability to make money depends on the resources in our earth; how each of these concepts are just individual—but interlinking—pieces of that big puzzle. I’ve heard the same students discuss their favorite Harry Potter characters, and although some revere Harry while others may have “I love Ron Weasley” t-shirts in their closets, they all recognize that each character is only one part of the story. There is a lot more to Harry Potter that creates a complete, complex world encompassing the struggles of ordinary people trying to get by in an unfair world. Only by looking at the bigger picture can we understand that world; only by bringing together all the pieces can Harry and his friends save that world. These lessons apply to us as well: only by integrating the 3 E’s and the many pieces of our own big picture will we ultimately achieve our purpose of creating a more sustainable society ourselves.

Saturday, 31 March, 2012, 9am to 4pm   

A day at Antioch University New England, Keene, NH with

David Sobel ~ author of Mapmaking with Children: A Sense of Place Education for the Elementary Years

and

Bob Coulter  ~ Director, Litzsinger Road Ecology Center,St. Louis, Missouri

Click here for information and to Register.

Featuring:

** indoors mapmaking activities suitable for early elementary grades

** an outdoors mapmaking/treasure hunt activity that involves local exploration and a literacy challenge, adaptable for grades K-6

** an outdoors Geocaching experience integrated with math trail challenges.  (This includes learning the use of GPS units for navigation and treasure finding.)

** a developmental model of children’s geographic understanding

** examples of  integrated curriculum

This workshop will range from developmental theory to brass-tacks practical, from serious reflecting on the purposes of education to the giddy thrill of finding hidden treasure.   Come prepared to draw maps, solve problems, plan curriculum and perhaps get a bit wet and muddy.

Click here to register through the Antioch Center for School Renewal.

by Richard Grogan

Have you ever felt that you are working on the wrong things? As I look back on my educational experiences, I remember many points where I felt as though I was learning something I should know, but I failed to see the connection to any larger purpose.

I see Educating for Sustainability as a critical way to build that connection, as well as meaning, pursuit, and purpose into everything we teach, and everything we learn. Sustainability is a perfect target because it is a moving one; there is no ability (or excuse) to stop learning, because both the theory and practice of sustainability are in a perpetual state of change.

Many of the world’s great problems are rooted in sustainability. Conflicts emerge over intolerance, or scarce natural resources, and while armed, open conflicts based on these issues are less common in “western” countries, the political arena in which they take place in the U.S. and elsewhere have similarly disastrous outcomes.

The problems described above are often called “wicked problems,” but I instead endeavor to teach students of all ages that there is great beauty to be found in complexity; I see this as one of the most important lessons in education for sustainability. While there are no easy answers to these situations, there are patterns, feedback loops, and other joyous discoveries, and in my experience, when you identify complexity it means you are asking the right questions.

Whether personally relevant to each of us or not, it strikes me anecdotally that we increasingly don’t see ourselves as pursuing any common goals – no matter how broad. In the U.S., we are plied with platitudes such as the pursuit of “liberty” or “freedom,” but this is often operationalized through things like tax cuts or military spending. And that is what I mean by working on the wrong things; those are simply tactics, devoid of vision or long-term strategies guiding us towards a “better” world in the future.

Peter Checkland's landmark book "Systems Thinking, Systems Practice"

By contrast, sustainability is itself a vision. While we are reluctant to put a final point on a single definition, we know that it is often explained by referring to complex systems, which paint, as Peter Checkland would call it, a Rich Picture of interconnectedness, and hence feedback impacting others based on our actions, and impacting us based on others’ choices.

The sooner that a vision of all of us working together, impacted by each other, is integrated into the earliest educational environments (which include how we treat each other…in the worldwide classroom), the sooner we can understand why even working on what feels like the wrong things leads us to the pursuit of a greater good.

by Tom Julius

What do glaciers, bottled water, building highways, and seashore erosion have in common?

Global climate change for one.

Last night I had the wonderful experience of participating in the Surry Village Charter School 7th and 8th grade exhibition on Global Climate Change. Students displayed library research they had done in conjunction with the Student Climate Data project using the NASA Innovations in Climate Education curriculum. To find out more you can click the links in this post or check out the School, Curriculum, and Organization pages that are part of this website.

This was a great example of how to do Climate Change in a middle school classroom in a way that engages students in thinking about the Environment, Economics and Social Equity. They analyzed information and data from their library research, and discussed the ways the 3E’s are inter-related.
Finally, they presented to an adult audience. Its important to note that these students in grades K-6 had lots of opportunities to engage with their local environment and connect with their immediate community.

However, there are lots of examples of how climate change curriculum can foster fear in children. Educating For Sustainability faculty member David Sobel recently discussed this in his presentation “Climate Change meets Ecophobia” at the New England Aquarium. Check out his whole talk in the video below or go to the Green Schools Conference, February 27-29 and see David talk about this topic in person.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 159 other followers